THE MADNESS OF FRANKENSTEIN
By Derrick Ferguson
Pulp Work Press
138 pgs.
New Pulp writer Derrick Ferguson is best known for his
action packed adventures, be they the exploits of Dillon, Fortune McCall or
Sebastian Red. All of these should already be on your reading list. But back in
1914, Ferguson wrote this truly amazing novella, “The Madness of Frankenstein”
that is his homage to the great Hammer horror flicks of the 60s and 70s. Having
finally picked up a copy, we were eager open its pages and discover what
special grisly treats Mr. Ferguson had whipped up for his unsuspecting readers.
The book is a non-stop, frantic, over the top story with
enough colorful characters to cast a dozen movies. A young scientist named
Peter Holden is imprisoned because of his fanatical obsession with the infamous
Doctor Victor Von Frankenstein; the monster-maker. But Holden isn’t the only
person seeking the notorious villain. The Holy Mother Church has inaugurated a
group of warrior clerics calling themselves the Justicers and their singular
mission is to find Frankenstein and put an end to his blasphemous career.
When a ravenously beautiful young woman named Angelique
appears with news of Frankenstein’s whereabouts, a Justicer named Christopher
Wrightson has Holden released in his charge. Angelique’s information has
Frankenstein somehow connected to an insane asylum located far in the
northern woods. The party sets out immediately unaware of the true horrors that
await them in this damp, dark fortress of madness.
Aside from the sheer brutality of Ferguson’s prose, there is
also a strain of black humor evident as he peppers his tale with some very
recognizable names. These are his personal “Easter eggs” and makes the story
that much more fun. Not a word is wasted, not a classic action ignored as “The
Madness of Frankenstein” delivers a truly unforgettable reading experience.
Our only request; when is the sequel coming?
Thank you, sir! I'm delighted you so thoroughly enjoyed reading it!
ReplyDeletePurchased.
ReplyDeleteYou won't be disappointed, Phil.
ReplyDeleteGreatness. Like the Hammer film they should have made in 1976.
ReplyDelete